The Google Book Settlement - What this means for Williams College

Although the settlement potentially offers access to millions of books, there are issues of particular concern.

  • Many fear the potential of a Google monopoly.  The Justice Department has launched an investigation into whether the settlement would violate antitrust laws.  Academic librarians underscore what the settlement implies about (un)equal access to information, and the effect a monopoly would have on the future of library subscription costs. 
  • User privacy has been not addressed, and we have no idea how our community's use of Google content may be captured and exploited.

 

More information about Google's current project:

As of early 2009, Google Book Search comprised seven million books.  Of these:

  • One million are in the public domain and can be downloaded in their entirety.
  • Fewer than one million are in copyright and in print; those supplied by publishers often have only limited previews or no preview at all.
  • Items not in the public domain have only snippet previews; this group includes five million works in copyright but out of print, including orphan works.

 

Details regarding who will see what under the proposed settlement:

Google will continue to scan in-copyright books, and continue to allow all users to search the content. 

  • Google will display up to 20% of an out of print book's content, with displays differing according to the type of work, ex: fiction vs. non-fiction.  This is more than Google currently allows through snippet previews. 
  • Users will not be able to print out or copy-and-paste preview displays. 
  • There will be no snippets for in print books except through rightsholders' agreement.
  • Google will earn money through advertising and by selling access to the full text of out of print books: Google will keep 37%, and the remaining 63% will go into the Books Rights Registry (BRR) for distribution to rightsholders.

Individual users will be able to purchase permanent online access to the full text of an out of print book; this is in effect an online license for as long as Google is around. 

  • Google and the rightsholder/s will set the price of the book.  The rightsholder can even set the price at $0.
  • A user will be able to cut-and-paste up to 4 pages with a single command, or print up to 20 pages with a single command.

Google will provide free Public Access Service (PAS) to each public library and not-for-profit higher education institution that requests it.  Williams would get access at only one terminal.   

  • The user at the PAS terminal will be able to download the full text of all books in the Institutional Subscription Database (ISD) which will include the out of print books.
  • A user will be able to print pages for a 'reasonable' per page fee set by the BRR, but will not be able to cut-and-paste.

Google will sell access to the ISD to colleges. 

  • The subscribing institution will authorize particular users (faculty, students, staff, etc.). 
  • Access will continue only for the duration of the subscription. 
  • Google and the BRR will set the price of access to the ISD and price will be based upon the number of FTE users.  Libraries that contribute books to the ISD can receive a discount based on the number of titles that come from their collections.
  • Under this model users will be able cut-and-paste and print as if they had purchased individual access to the book.
  • Authorized users will be able to make books available to other authorized users through hyperlinks, etc. for course use such as e-reserves.

 

More information about the suit:

The suit is extremely complicated.  The points above have been snipped or summarized from several sites and documents.